JRE
Docket No. 1584-13
9 January 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section LES2s
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board found that you
were discharged by reason of physical disability on 23 June 1993
in accordance with your acceptance of the findings of the
Physical Evaluation Board that your mental disorder was 0%
disabling. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that
your disorder was ratable at or above 30% disabling, the Board
was unable to recommend favorable action on your application.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the panel members will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. Youare entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. Inthis regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR51 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That rating, which was established by Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating officials and assigned by the Physical Evaluation Board during the Integrated Disability Evaluation process, was based on the demonstrated limitation of motion of your spine. Inthis regard, it is important to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8415 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition, not a disability, during initial training. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03527-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your disability was ratable at or above 30% disabling as of 12 May 2006, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0694 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 4 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12128 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an offical naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8290 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dac Docket No. ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02744-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2009. In view of the foregoing, and as you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2796 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2014. In addition, that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you a disability rating for anxiety almost forty years after you were discharged from the Navy was not considered probative of error or injustice in your naval record because the VA acted without regard to the issue...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12615 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2012. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental disorder which rendered you unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 21 October 1987, the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08920-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2007. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...